THE MYTH OF BUY
AND HOLD
What do the companies Radio Corporation of America (RCA), Cisco,
General Motors (GM), Trans World Airlines (TWA), Admiral, and Pan
American Airways (Pan Am), have in common? These are or were sig-
nificant American, for the most part New York Stock Exchange listed,
corporations that have, in years past, risen to and then fallen from
grace. Shares of Cisco, for example, rose from a price of 4 in 1992 to
82 in early 2000 before falling back to 8 by the end of 2004. GM, once
the granddaddy of all corporations and the largest employer in the
country? Priced at 11 at the bottom of the great 1973–1974 bear mar-
ket, GM recovered to a price of 94 at the start of 2000, before declin-
ing to 31 three years later, to lower still and near bankruptcy by the
fourth quarter of 2005. Wal-Mart, with more than 1.1 million U.S.
employees, has—of course—supplanted GM as the nation’s leading
private employer.
RCA, a pioneer in home radios and radio communication during
the 1920s, rose from a price of 11 in the mid-1920s to 114 by
September 1929 before plummeting to 3 in 1932. Admiral, a hot tele-
vision issue in the 1960s, met a similar fate—and never did recover.
TWA and Pan Am, once investor favorites, both failed to survive
shakeouts in the airline industry. The drug industry has generally
been regarded as one of the more consistent investment sectors for
investors, but this has not prevented Merck’s roller coaster ride from
6 to 72 and down to 28. Another major M, Merrill Lynch, has seen its
price range from 6 to 91 and then back to 26, like Merck within just
one decade.
Such ups and downs are not limited to individual securities. The
NASDAQ Composite of more than 3,500 issues rose from a price
level of approximately 230 in 1984 to 5133 in 2000, before falling to
1108 at the bear market low in 2002. Even the more venerable
Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has recently given up as much as 49.7%,
declining from 1,527.46 (2000) to 768.63 (2002).
The point of all this is simply that, regardless of what Wall Street
and the mutual fund industry would have you believe, there are con-
siderable risks to buying and holding stocks, even for long-term
investors, and especially for investors who may need to draw on their
assets during periods in which the stock market is showing significant
cyclical weakness (for example, during the 1930s, 1973–1974, and
more recently, between 2000 and early 2005).
Moreover, buy and hold strategies, which actually worked well
during the 1980s and 1990s, the two strongest back–to-back decades
in history, are not as likely to work as well in the foreseeable future.
The economist Paul Krugman, writing in The New York Times,
February 1, 2005, observed that whereas annual economic growth in
the United States averaged 3.4% over the previous 75 years, it is likely
to average only 1.9% between 2005 and 2080. Inasmuch as the
progress of stock prices tends to reflect economic growth, investors
who limit themselves to just the U.S. stock market may be placing
themselves in a position from which it will be difficult to achieve the
rates of capital growth required for expenses later in life.