1 Introduction
Lili Yan Ing, Martin Richardson and
Shujiro Urata
Right after the World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in january
1995, the number of bilateral and regional agreements began to mushroom. The
number of free trade areas (FTAs) grew from 44 in 1995 to 290 in November
2018. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) also experienced
an increase in the number of FTAs from 5 to 47 over the same period. As of No-
vember 2018, ASEAN as a group had six FTAs, of which one is among ASEAN
countries, and the others are with its six main trading partners: the ASEAN
Free Trade Area (AFTA), ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand FTA, ASEAN-China
FTA, ASEAN-India FTA, ASEAN-japan CEPA and ASEAN-Korea FTA. To
improve the level of liberalisation in goods, services and investment, ASEAN
and its six main trading partners have agreed to consider a new FTA: the Re-
gional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).
The RCEP has been under negotiation since November 2012. Six years later,
by the time of the final stage of editing this book, November 2018, the RCEP
has been through more than 20 rounds of negotiations. We hope this volume
will serve as meaningful analyses to academics, practitioners and policymakers
in providing not just an understanding of regional integration and cooperation
in East Asia to date but also a profound base that provides insights in designing
better preferential trade agreements or economic cooperation in the region. The
book comprises ten chapters which analyse trade in goods, trade in services and
investment.
In Chapter 2, Urata starts the book with an overview of regionalism in East
Asia. East Asia has witnessed the proliferation of FTAs during the last three
decades, beginning with the AFTA in 1993. A series of bilateral and regional
FTAs have been discussed and enacted since around the turn of the century in
a competitive pattern, involving many East Asian countries, including ASEAN
member states China, japan and Korea. Despite the active formation of FTAs,
a region-wide mega-FTA involving all East Asian countries has not yet been
established. The closest one is the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific
Partnership (CPTPP) agreement, which is scheduled to be enacted towards the
end of 2018, but it only includes a few East Asian countries.
The RCEP agreement, which includes all 16 East Asian countries, has been in
negotiation since May 2013 without concluding. The importance of establishing
a rules-based trading system such as RCEP has increased because of intensifying
protectionism by the US under the Trump administration and the stalemate in
multilateral trade negotiations in the WTO. This chapter reviews the trend in
FTAs in East Asia by referring to their competitive nature and identifying their
special characteristics, and provides suggestions to overcome the challenges to
reach an agreement for the RCEP negotiation.
Chapter 3 by Itakura estimates the economic effects of the integration of 16
East Asian countries in the RCEP. Itakura estimates how the formation of the
RCEP will affect individual ASEAN member economies’ gross domestic prod-
uct (GDP) growth, exports, imports and total welfare. By applying a recursively
dynamic computable general equilibrium model of global trade, the chapter con-
siders three policy scenarios: Scenario 1 is tariff rate reductions, Scenario 2 is this
plus services trade cost reductions and Scenario 3 is Scenario 2 plus investment
liberalisation.
Applying Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)-11, the simulation experi-
ments of RCEP explore the potential economic gains from liberalising goods
and services trade, improving logistics of merchandise goods and fostering in-
vestment in the region. The simulation results suggest that all the participating
countries in RCEP will gain in terms of real GDP, ASEAN’s real GDP rising
by 4.7 percent from the baseline, in 2035. For each ASEAN Member States,
RCEP has varying degrees of impact, reflecting the economic size and depth of
liberalisation. As RCEP commits to promoting investment, the increase in real
GDP is boosted even more. Investment in all member countries rises as RCEP is
implemented, and trade volumes expand for the participating countries.
In Chapter 4, Zhinhong Yu provides an anatomy of the evolution of the struc-
ture of China’s trade with Southeast Asian countries (namely ASEAN), using
detailed Chinese Customs data. The analysis discovers dramatic compositional
changes in ASEAN-China trade across ownership, product and the processing
trade regime over the last two decades. In particular, since the late 1990s China’s
active engagement in the global production network has led to the reorienta-
tion of China-ASEAN trade towards intermediate goods and machinery sectors,
which are characterised by high processing trade intensities and are dominated
by foreign-owned firms located in China. As a result, ASEAN’s exports to China
have surged, leading to sizeable trade surpluses.
However, this trend has not continued in recent years and, if anything, has
reversed. Indeed, the growth of China’s imports from ASEAN firms has slowed
down since 2011, accompanied by decreasing shares of the machinery and in-
termediate good sectors, and declining processing trade intensity. On the other
hand, non-processing exports from indigenous Chinese firms to ASEAN have
risen sharply, especially in these same sectors. Taken together, these forces
turned ASEAN’s trade surplus against China into a trade deficit, which might
even widen in the years to come. The results imply that policymakers in ASEAN
countries must make appropriate policy adjustments to cope with China’s struc-
tural transformation towards a “new normal” model of trade growth in order to
achieve a healthier trade balance with China in future.
East Asian Integration: Proposal review by Lili Yan Ing, Martin Richardson and Shujiro Urata