1
Changing from Financial Control
to Financial Management in the Public
Sector: An Introduction to the Changes
That Will Be Required
This chapter describes the key aspects of public financial management and
internal control reform, viewed through a managerial lens. It describes how,
without a thorough appreciation of the linkage with management, this reform
will at best fail to meet the intended objectives and at worst could add to
administrative bureaucracy and hence costs. These are recurrent themes
throughout this guide. This chapter introduces some of the terms and facets
of the reform that will be explored in more depth in later chapters. Overall,
this should be regarded as a major reform and it will take several years to
achieve. It affects the quality of policy making, the relationships between poli-
ticians and the civil (or local government) service officials, the operational
managerial arrangements and the approach to internal control and budgetary
and accounting information. To undertake the reform is not a simple task: it
has wide-reaching effects including the arrangements for delegation, account-
ability and transparency. The requirements of the reform may be in conflict
with traditional customs and practices and these may affect whether or not
the reform can be effectively implemented.
1.1 The Aim of and Audience for This Guide
This guide is about the development and then the practical application of the
public financial management and internal control (PFM/IC) reform. It aims to
help countries seeking to adopt PFM/IC to undertake this successfully and to
avoid common pitfalls experienced by many countries which have tried to adopt
PFM/IC, but ended up ultimately with only superficial reforms. The critical
pitfall that this guide seeks to highlight and help countries avoid is the common
assumption that focusing solely on the technical procedures and bureaucratic
processes of introducing PFM/IC will achieve the substantive benefits of the
reform. It will not! The technical aspects of the PFM/IC reform are important
but to achieve a robust reform, managerial changes will almost certainly be
required. Changes to governance arrangements and transparency are also likely
to be needed. The nature of the necessary reforms may conflict with traditional
custom and practice with the risk that such reforms may be difficult to embed.
Unfortunately, this failure to recognise the impact upon management and
traditional custom and practice has been a typical feature of financial manage-
ment reform activities, both of PFM/IC and other PFM reforms, such as
programme budgeting and accrual accounting, leading to some being
described as ‘fake’ reforms. A key message of this guide is that countries
should do their utmost to avoid this failure. To do that, countries should rec-
ognise that introducing PFM/IC requires a major managerial reform and it
should be treated as such by senior politicians and senior appointed officials.
This guide demonstrates the complexities of the reform.
Before PFM/IC is introduced, countries will have in place some form of
public financial administration and internal control (PFA/IC). The principal
difference between the two systems is that PFA/IC has a focus on the control
of financial inputs, whereas the more advanced PFM/IC has a focus not only
on control of financial inputs but also upon the efficient and effective delivery
of the outputs of public services. This applies equally to revenue collection
arrangements, including taxation. This change of focus is central to improv-
ing public sector productivity. With PFM/IC the operational management
of a public organisation has considerably more discretion over the detail of
spending (and revenue collection arrangements), that is, the mix of inputs
and levels of spending in order to achieve objectives (outputs) and to do so
efficiently and effectively, than it would with PFA/IC. Discretion is also
needed when circumstances require that economies have to be made so that
minimum damage occurs to existing services and activities. PFM/IC