chapter
1
the nature
oF Money
and the
possibility
oF Crypto-
currency as
Money
By professor tony Lawson,
University of Cambridge
A. the Nature of Money
Can forms of cryptocurrency become money? to pursue this question, it
is necessary first to be clear on what is meant by money, and on what
precisely is required for something to be, or to become, money. the concern of this opening chapter is precisely with this issue, to identify conditions that must be met for a form of cryptocurrency to qualify as money.
A form of money, just like any other social phenomenon, is
a property of a particular community, and so typically pos-
sessing various community-specific features. Many com-
munities have produced money, however, and the concern
here is with commonalities of all the numerous forms.
In this regard, the most obvious common or shared
feature is that by which a money can everywhere be
identified or recognised. This is its property of being
employed as a general means of payment, of being
useable to discharge any debt in the community in
which the money is produced.
If, say, in any specific money community, an individual
participant requests of a seller, a loaf of bread, or per-
haps a meal, then, when the bread is handed over, or
after the meal has been consumed, the buyer is in debt
to the seller. It is an identifying property of money that,
in all such transactions (excepting in cases where a
specific alternative agreement on means of payment has
been reached in advance of a debt being occurred), the
money can be used to settle the resulting debt.
A basic condition for a general means of payment to
exist in any community is that the latter has a system
of value accounting that includes, as a component, a
(community-specific) unit of value. This is simply a unit
of value measurement or assignment -- such as pound
sterling, US dollar, euro -- in terms of which all goods,
services, or assets in a community will have their as-
sessed values expressed. Clearly all items of money
must also be denominated in the same units as the
debts, if the money is to be used to cancel them. So,
money will itself be a feature of a system of value ac-
counting that includes a unit of value (or account) as
an additional accepted component.
If the nominal property of any money, i.e. that by which
it is identified, lies in its being accepted as a general
means of payment, a further more fundamental feature
that grounds this property is the manner of the mon-
ey’s incorporation as a component of the community’s
system of value accounting. Most social phenomena
(not just money) are in fact constituted through pro-
cesses whereby certain kinds of things are incorporat-
ed into community systems as components. In all
cases, the phenomena are created by processes of social
positioning, whereby selected kinds of things are al-
located to positions, thereby constituting them as
different types of phenomena qua system components,
and whereupon their uses, qua positioned items or
system components, are governed by community-ac-
cepted sets of rights and obligations. To see this, it is
enough to think of the creation and acceptable uses of
means of transport, motorways, car parks, traffic
lights, passports, schools and hospitals, etc.1
Money is simply a specific conforming instance of this
general process of social reality constitution. The